One of the most fundamental requirements of a capitalist economic system (and one of the most misunderstood concepts) is a strong system of property rights.
A lot of people complain that there's a conflict between property rights and human rights.
This isn't true because property rights are human rights.
Social critics of property rights do not want to abolish those rights, rather, transfer them from private to government ownership.
This is known as the tragedy of the commons
A property right is the exclusive authority to determine how a resource is used.
The three basic elements of property rights:
Exclusivity of rights to choose the use of a resource
Exclusivity of rights to the services of a resource
Rights to exchange the resource at mutually agreeable terms
Limitations like price controls and restrictions on the right to sell are reductions of private property rights.
Under a private property system, the market values reflect the preferences and demands of society.
Property rights eliminate competition for control of economic resources.
Market values become influential.
More complete property rights make discrimination more costly.
The two extremes in weakened private property rights are:
Socialism: government agents excercise control over resources.
Soviet union fell because of this
Government officials siphoned out the profits of the government into private corporations, which caused a deficit in the budget of the Soviet government.
Commonly owned resources
No property rights causes people to have less incentives to heed changes or to preserve the resources.
Private property rights don't need to be held by a single person
Limited liability corporation
Joint ventures, mutuals, partnerships
Private property rights are not absolute
Conflicting with the desire to secure private property rights is the desire to acquire more wealth by taking from other.
Military conquest and forcible reallocation
This is unethical.
Private property rights are the rights of humans to use specified goods and to exchange them.